Category Archives: Best Stocks To Buy For 2026

Google’s Gemini 3 Deep Think Model Gets Major Upgrade, Aiming at Research and Engineering Applications

Leave a reply

Without any tool assistance, the model achieved a 48.4% accuracy rate on the “Humanity’s Last Exam” (HLE) benchmark and scored 84.6% on the ARC-AGI-2 test. It also reached gold medal level in the written portions of the 2025 International Physics and Chemistry Olympiads. Google stated that the new model is designed to help researchers tackle “unsolvable” problems—ranging from identifying flaws in research papers to optimizing semiconductor crystal growth.

Gemini 3 Deep Think (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Google’s deep thinking model, has undergone a significant upgrade, taking its reasoning capabilities from abstract theory to practical applications. This upgrade focuses on solving complex challenges in modern scientific research and engineering, marking Google’s strategic investment in the enterprise AI market.

On Thursday, February 12, Google officially announced the Gemini 3 Deep Think upgrade, stating that the updated model achieved breakthrough results across several industry benchmarks, including 84.6% in the ARC-AGI-2 test (verified by the ARC Prize Foundation) and an Elo score of 3455 on the competitive programming platform Codeforces.

The upgraded deep thinking model is now available to Google AI Ultra subscribers and is accessible through the Gemini API for selected researchers, engineers, and enterprise users for early access. Google reported that the model has already shown practical value in real-world research, from detecting logical flaws in research papers to optimizing semiconductor material growth processes.

This release positions Google to directly compete with OpenAI’s o1 series and Anthropic’s Claude in the AI reasoning model race. As general AI capabilities become increasingly commoditized, specialized reasoning abilities have become the new battleground in the enterprise market. The launch of the deep thinking model signals that Google is unwilling to concede in this high-value sector.

From Benchmark Results to Gold Medal Performance
Google highlighted the deep thinking model’s performance on rigorous academic benchmarks. In addition to the previously mentioned results, Gemini 3 Deep Think achieved gold medal levels in the written portions of the 2025 International Physics and Chemistry Olympiads and scored 50.5% in the CMT-Benchmark advanced theoretical physics test.

Comparative results from Google show that Gemini 3 Deep Think surpassed the strongest models from Anthropic and OpenAI in several tests, including outperforming the Gemini 3 Pro preview version. For instance, in the ARC-AGI-2 test, Gemini 3 Deep Think scored 84.6%, while Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking Max achieved 68.8%, and OpenAI’s GPT-5.2 Thinking xhigh scored 52.9%.

Google’s team stated that this upgrade was developed in close collaboration with scientists and researchers to address research challenges that lack clear boundaries or single correct answers, often involving messy or incomplete data. The model combines deep scientific knowledge with practical engineering capabilities, bridging the gap from abstract theory to practical applications.

Beyond breakthroughs in mathematics and programming, the deep thinking model has extended its performance to multiple scientific fields, including chemistry and physics (including theoretical physics). This broad applicability means the model is no longer limited to specific disciplines, but rather serves as a cross-disciplinary research tool.

Real-World Application Cases Validate Its Value
Early test users have demonstrated the model’s real-world potential. Lisa Carbone, a mathematician at Rutgers University, used the deep thinking model to review a highly specialized mathematical paper while researching the required structures for high-energy physics. The model successfully identified a subtle logical flaw that had previously gone undetected despite peer review.

At Duke University, Wang Lab used the deep thinking model to optimize the manufacturing method for complex crystal growth, aiming at the discovery of potential semiconductor materials. The model successfully designed a formula that grew thin films over 100 microns in thickness, achieving precision that was previously unattainable with prior methods.

Anupam Pathak, head of research and development at Google’s Platforms & Devices Division and former CEO of Liftware, tested the upgraded deep thinking model to accelerate the design of physical components.

Another use case showcased by Google demonstrated how the upgraded Gemini 3 Deep Think could convert sketches into 3D printable physical models. The model can analyze blueprints, model complex shapes, and generate the necessary files for 3D printing.

Strategic Positioning in the Enterprise Market
This upgrade reflects a broader shift in the AI industry—from general chatbots to specialized reasoning engines that can tackle professional-grade problems. For enterprise clients, evaluation criteria are changing, focusing not only on which AI can write code or summarize documents the fastest, but also on reasoning capabilities—whether the model can handle complex financial models, analyze experimental data, identify methodological flaws, or assist in patent research or drug discovery.

Google’s advantage lies in its integration capabilities. The deep thinking model is not an isolated tool but part of the broader Gemini ecosystem, meaning it can leverage Google’s vast knowledge graph, scientific datasets, and research partnerships. Researchers using deep thinking through Google Cloud theoretically have access to computational power and data sources that standalone AI services cannot match.

On Thursday, the company posted on X, saying, “The upgraded deep thinking model is driving discoveries and helping researchers solve ‘unsolvable’ problems—from finding flaws in research papers to optimizing semiconductor (crystal) growth.” This statement underscores the model’s transition from benchmark tests to real-world applications.

From a product strategy perspective, Google is targeting both consumer and enterprise users. Google AI Ultra subscribers can immediately access the model via the Gemini app, while scientists, engineers, and enterprise users can apply for early access through the Gemini API. This layered strategy reflects Google’s dual goal of maintaining a presence in the consumer market while vying for high-value enterprise clients.

AI Reasoning Model Competition Heats Up
The launch of the deep thinking model puts Google in direct competition with OpenAI and Anthropic in the AI reasoning race. OpenAI’s o1 model reportedly spends more time “thinking” before generating responses, using reinforcement learning to improve reasoning chains. Anthropic’s Claude 3 has also carved out a niche in research and analytical tasks. Now, Google has staked its claim in the same field, backed by the infrastructure and distribution advantages of being integrated into Workspace and Cloud Platform.

For professional users, this means making a choice between fast general responses and slower, deeper reasoning, which could lead to a new architectural decision. Applications may route simple queries to standard models while escalating complex issues to the reasoning model, creating a layered AI reasoning approach.

Google posted on X on Thursday: “Gemini 3 Deep Think performed exceptionally well in pushing the frontiers of intelligence in benchmark tests. Specific data: 48.4% in ‘Humanity’s Last Exam’ (without tools), 84.6% in ARC-AGI-2 (verified by the ARC Prize Foundation), and an Elo rating of 3455 on Codeforces.”

Google also pointed out that the model now excels in fields like chemistry and physics.

The true test of this competition, however, will not be the press releases, but real-world adoption. If research institutions and engineering firms begin using deep thinking models to tackle complex tasks, it will validate Google’s judgment—that the future of enterprise AI lies in depth, not speed. The company has made it clear: it is competing for the high-end sector of the AI market, where reasoning matters more than conversation.

Meta AI Glasses Sales Surpass 7 Million Units Last Year, Tripling the Total of the Previous Two Years

Leave a reply

On Thursday, after the European market opened, the world’s largest eyewear manufacturer, EssilorLuxottica (EPA:EL), saw its shares surge by more than 5%. This came after the company disclosed that sales of the AI glasses launched in collaboration with American tech company Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) surged in 2025, signaling the increasing popularity of AI wearable devices among consumers.

EssilorLuxottica’s earnings report showed that its AI glasses shipments in 2025 exceeded 7 million units, more than three times the combined sales of around 2 million units in 2023 and 2024.

Since 2019, EssilorLuxottica has been a partner with Meta for AI glasses. The two companies first launched smart glasses under the Ray-Ban brand in 2021 and later released a second-generation upgrade in 2023. In June of the previous year, their partnership expanded to include more brands, with the introduction of Oakley smart glasses aimed at athletes.

As the AI wave continues to rise, the prospects for glasses as a platform for AI devices look increasingly bright. In September of last year, Meta introduced the next-generation Ray-Ban smart glasses, which can be controlled through gestures and neural technology via a wristband. One of the lenses is equipped with a small display screen.

Meta stated in January that due to “unprecedented” demand for the $799 Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses in the U.S. market, it delayed the planned international launch, originally set for early 2026.

Last month, there were market rumors that, as sales of the Ray-Ban smart glasses steadily increase, Meta and EssilorLuxottica are discussing plans to double the annual production capacity for AI glasses, aiming to increase it to 20 million units or more by the end of this year. The two companies have also discussed the possibility of exceeding 30 million units per year if demand proves strong enough.

It is worth noting that concerns over the impact of the AI glasses’ sales surge on profit margins led to a more than 20% decline in EssilorLuxottica’s stock price over the past three months. RBC Capital Markets analysts have pointed out that the gross margin of the Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses is much lower than that of the eyewear giant’s broader product line, and the company may need to rely on rising prices and shipment volumes to offset cost pressures.

The latest earnings report revealed that, influenced by U.S. tariffs and the expanded sales of AI glasses, EssilorLuxottica’s adjusted profit margin for fiscal year 2025 is projected to be 16%, a decrease of 70 basis points compared to 2024, based on constant exchange rates.

During the earnings call, Stefano Grassi, EssilorLuxottica’s Chief Financial Officer, told analysts, “I believe that, both internally and externally, we will have the capacity to meet the demand in the coming years, and we are planning based on this assumption, maintaining close cooperation with Meta.”

Although the company did not disclose specific production targets, Grassi added, “As we have seen in recent years, we do expect that as product innovation advances, the product price mix will continue to improve.”

In its financial guidance, EssilorLuxottica expects steady overall revenue growth over the next five years, with adjusted operating profit maintaining a similar growth pace.

Wall Street Analysts: The Selloff Has Gone Too Far—U.S. Software Stocks Have Fallen Into a “Golden Pit”

Leave a reply

Mark Luschini, Chief Investment Strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott, said: “It seems people now think software prices will fall in a straight line to zero. This one-sided trade is so obvious that it could actually set the stage for a rebound.”

These stocks are currently at historic lows. The forward price-to-earnings ratio of the S&P North American Software Index fell below 20 for the first time last week. Although it has since rebounded to around 23 times as stocks recovered somewhat, it remains well below its long-term average P/E of 34.

Jefferies studied the 64 software stocks under its coverage and found that “42% are trading at or near their historical undervaluation levels,” analysts led by Brent Thill wrote in a report to clients on Sunday.

Michael Toomey of Jefferies’ equity trading desk said, “I think software stocks are about to see a strong rebound.” Technical traders at BTIG expressed a similar view, writing in a report last week that software stocks are “on the verge of capitulation and should find a tactical bottom here.”

The rebound appears to have already begun. A closely watched ETF tracking the software industry fell 15% over eight consecutive trading days from January 26 to February 4, but has since rebounded 7.2%. According to Vanda Research, retail investor buying of the ETF “hit a record,” which Vanda described as “one of the most aggressive instances of dip-buying in tech stocks—particularly software stocks—that we have observed in our dataset.”

Although uncertainty still hangs over the sector, the selloff has been so broad that many companies previously expected to be long-term winners have not been spared. Companies most frequently cited by market experts include Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT), Snowflake (NYSE:SNOW), ServiceNow (NYSE:NOW), Salesforce (NYSE:CRM), and Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR).

Data analytics software company Snowflake fell 27% in just six trading days from January 29 to February 5. However, the company holds a favorable position within the artificial intelligence ecosystem. Last week, Snowflake signed a $200 million multi-year partnership agreement with OpenAI and reached a similar deal with Anthropic PBC in December. In a February 5 report to clients, Thill wrote that Snowflake is “one of the clearest AI beneficiaries in the entire public software universe.” Institutions including UBS, Loop Capital, Wedbush, Bank of America, and DA Davidson have also spoken highly of Snowflake.

Michael Mullaney, Director of Global Market Research at Boston Partners, noted the weakness in Salesforce, ServiceNow (NYSE:NOW), and Workday (NASDAQ:WDAY). He said that if he were focused on growth stocks rather than value stocks, he would be buying these names on the dip.

Datadog (NASDAQ:DDOG) was also mentioned. Its shares surged 14% on Tuesday, marking the biggest gain since November, after the company reported strong results and issued better-than-expected revenue guidance.

AI coding—using artificial intelligence to write software code—is at the core of the market’s bearish sentiment toward software. If AI services offered by companies such as Anthropic or OpenAI can replace existing software packages, it would put significant pressure on the revenues, margins, and pricing power of the displaced companies. The recent stock market plunge was largely triggered by Anthropic’s launch of a legal workflow automation tool, followed by another tool focused on financial research. Earlier, an AI tool from Alphabet Inc. had also caused sharp declines in video game and mobile advertising stocks.

So far, this disruptive shift has largely been anticipated, but its magnitude remains difficult to quantify. Industry research forecasts that earnings growth for the software and services sub-sector will reach 14.1% in 2026. While this growth rate is below the broader technology sector’s expected 31.7% expansion—driven by the booming semiconductor industry—it exceeds the S&P 500 Index’s projected growth rate of 13.7%. Software sales are showing a similar trend.

Luschini of Janney said: “There’s a lot of speculation about what might happen, but so far nothing has actually happened. The market is trying to price in future risks, but at this point, that speculation seems more hypothetical than real.”

Even so, software skeptics do have some warning signs to point to. Shares of monday.com (NASDAQ:MNDY) fell 21% earlier this week after the company issued disappointing revenue guidance. S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) also dropped 9.7% on Tuesday after releasing similarly disappointing earnings guidance.

However, most of these cases appear to be isolated. Data show that of the 10 software companies in the S&P 500 that have reported earnings so far this season, all 10 exceeded earnings expectations and eight beat revenue estimates. This outperformance rate exceeds that of the broader S&P 500, where 81% of companies have beaten earnings expectations and 66% have topped revenue forecasts.

Mullaney said such performance demonstrates that current trends are not severe enough to justify investors abandoning the software sector altogether. “A mere slowdown in earnings growth does not explain the magnitude of these stock declines,” he said. “However, I do believe that concerns about AI-driven disruption provide a reasonable justification for profit-taking.”