Category Archives: Best Stocks To Buy For 2026

ExxonMobil CEO Calls Venezuela “Uninvestable”; Trump Fires Back: “I’ll Probably Leave Them Out”

President Donald Trump stated on Sunday that he may move to block ExxonMobil (XOM) from investing in Venezuela, following comments by the company’s CEO describing the country as a market that currently lacks investment value.

The dispute stems from a meeting of oil executives held at the White House last Friday. During the session, ExxonMobil CEO Darren Woods told Trump bluntly that Venezuela would not be an attractive investment target unless it overhauled its legal framework.

Woods specifically noted that ExxonMobil’s assets had been confiscated by local authorities on two separate occasions since the company first entered Venezuela in the 1940s. His remarks highlight a persistent reluctance among top energy groups to commit massive capital without security guarantees, despite Trump’s attempts to lure them with promises of future prospects and a push for “at least $100 billion” in investment to boost production and lower U.S. gas prices.

Woods’ stance was a significant blow to Trump, who is currently lobbying U.S. oil giants to spend hundreds of billions to help revitalize Venezuela’s oil industry.

“I didn’t like the response from Exxon,” Trump told reporters Sunday while traveling back to Washington on Air Force One. “I’ll probably leave Exxon out. I wasn’t happy with their answer; they were being very cute.”

ExxonMobil has not yet issued an immediate comment on the matter.

Mixed Reactions from Industry Leaders

In contrast to Exxon’s hardline stance, other executives at the White House meeting reacted more positively to Trump’s proposal, suggesting a potential influx of capital in the short term.

  • Chevron (CVX) stated it could increase production by 50% within 18 to 24 months by expanding its existing 240,000-barrel-per-day project.
  • Shell (SHEL) CEO Wael Sawan noted the European giant has identified “billions of dollars in investment opportunities” and is “ready to go” as soon as U.S. sanction waivers are provided.
  • Repsol claimed it could triple its production to 150,000 barrels per day within two to three years, while Italy’s Eni, which holds 4 billion barrels in reserves, also signaled readiness to increase investment.

Under further questioning from Trump during the meeting, Woods softened his tone slightly, stating that Exxon would send a technical team to Venezuela within weeks to assess the situation and expressed “confidence” that necessary reforms could be implemented.

However, even Harold Hamm, founder of Continental Resources and a long-time Trump ally, declined to make specific commitments. While he praised Venezuela’s reserves as “true gems,” he admitted the country presents both “exciting prospects” and “challenges” that the industry must navigate.

No Compensation for the Past

The mixed signals from Friday’s meeting reflect the dilemma facing oil companies: a desire to capture a share of the market versus a deep-seated fear of a politically volatile nation with a history of expropriating foreign assets.

“Investing heavily in Venezuela to meet the administration’s goals carries extremely high legal, political, and geopolitical risks,” noted Meghan O’Sullivan, a geopolitical and energy expert at Harvard University.

Despite his urgency for investment, Trump does not appear inclined to offer substantive concessions regarding compensation or financial guarantees.

For companies whose assets were previously seized, Trump made it clear that reimbursement is unlikely. He told Ryan Lance, CEO of ConocoPhillips (COP)—which suffered a $12 billion loss due to expropriation—”You’re going to make a lot of money in the future, but we aren’t going to look at the past.”

“We’re starting over,” Trump emphasized. “We’re not going to worry about who lost what in the past; that was their fault. That was during another presidency.”

Furthermore, Trump ruled out using U.S. taxpayer money to indemnify corporate investment risks, despite having mentioned the idea previously. “It’s not going to take government money,” he told the executives. “Our oil giants are going to spend at least $100 billion—that’s your money, not the government’s.”

When asked about financial backstops, Trump said he hoped they wouldn’t be necessary but suggested the U.S. government could provide some form of security and legal guarantees—a key demand from the industry. “You’re going to have absolute security,” he promised.

However, regarding physical security, Trump suggested that protection would be provided by the Venezuelan regime rather than the U.S. military. “I think the people of Venezuela are going to give you very good security.”

A High-Stakes Gamble

Legal experts believe that while there is “intense interest” in Venezuelan investment, there is a long road ahead before intentions turn into action.

“The difficulty right now is that the dust hasn’t settled, and the logistical and political challenges remain severe,” said Carlos Solé, co-chair of the Latin America practice at Baker Botts. He believes the process for obtaining licenses or sanction waivers from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) must be streamlined before companies act.

Aurelio Fernandez-Concheso, head of the Clyde & Co office in Venezuela, said that while they have received numerous inquiries from clients in the oil, gas, shipping, and insurance sectors, everyone remains “highly cautious” until the situation clears.

“Picking up the phone to talk to a consultant is one thing,” he remarked. “It is quite another to actually sign a check and put money into that country.”

The Highly Anticipated “AI Business Model”: Google Takes the Lead by Integrating Ads into Gemini

Alphabet (GOOGL) is introducing new personalized advertising features within its AI shopping tools, marking a pivotal step forward for tech giants in the race to monetize artificial intelligence.

On Sunday, Google announced that advertisers will now be able to offer exclusive deals to consumers preparing to purchase items through Google’s “AI Mode,” which is powered by its Gemini model. This move represents a significant evolution of Google’s traditional advertising paradigm.

“This is a new concept that moves beyond our traditional search advertising model,” said Vidhya Srinivasan, Vice President of Google Ads and Commerce. She noted that it enables retailers to provide value to AI-assisted shoppers at the most critical moments “to close the deal.” Google’s AI will determine precisely when to display these offers based on user shopping behavior and purchase probability.

The move comes as AI chatbots pose a potential threat to Google’s traditional “sponsored” ad placements, which generate tens of billions of dollars in annual revenue. Simultaneously, Google seeks to capitalize on the momentum of its latest large language model, Gemini 3, which has gained significant ground in its competition against OpenAI’s GPT-5.

Google also unveiled a “Universal Commerce Protocol,” allowing shopping agents to research products and complete purchases directly within its platform. The protocol was co-developed with major retailers and marketplaces, including Walmart, Target, and Shopify.

Beyond the Traditional Search Ad Model

The new advertising capabilities from Alphabet (GOOGL) allow brands to provide highly personalized ads—such as discount codes—through its chatbot, giving it an edge over AI rivals. This feature leverages contextual information from the user’s conversation with the chatbot and triggers offers based on relevant products the user has clicked on.

Retailers define the offers they wish to provide, while Google’s AI determines the optimal timing to present these deals to potential customers. Existing partners in Google Shopping include pet brand Petco, e.l.f. Cosmetics, and luggage manufacturer Samsonite.

Srinivasan indicated that while the initial pilot focuses on discounts, it will expand to support offers with other attributes. This will help shoppers prioritize value beyond just price, such as bundled deals and free shipping.

The AI Monetization Race Heats Up

Alphabet (GOOGL) is leveraging its massive market share in online search to expose its AI models to billions of users through the “AI Mode” added to search pages last year. Its standalone chatbot, Gemini, currently still trails ChatGPT in terms of popularity.

Last month, OpenAI suspended internal discussions regarding advertising products after CEO Sam Altman declared a “Code Red” to improve ChatGPT. This shift stemmed from concerns that competitors were narrowing OpenAI’s early lead in cutting-edge technology development.

Over the past year, AI firms including OpenAI, Microsoft, and Perplexity have raced to launch e-commerce features within their chatbots to find new ways to generate revenue from their popular but expensive AI products. As first reported by the Financial Times, OpenAI has been rolling out its own checkout feature, where the AI startup takes a commission on sales made via ChatGPT.

Tech Giants Bet on AI Shopping

On Thursday, Microsoft (MSFT) launched “Copilot Checkout,” which also offers recommendations and checkout services to users within its AI chat. Microsoft stated that users shopping through Copilot were 53% more likely to make a purchase within 30 minutes of interaction compared to those not using the feature.

At the National Retail Federation’s annual show in New York, Google CEO Sundar Pichai stated, “We need to work together. I think if we do it well, this will be an extraordinary moment of expansion.”

The “Universal Commerce Protocol” launched by Alphabet (GOOGL) will enable shopping agents to research and purchase products without leaving the platform, further solidifying the partnership between AI and major retailers like Walmart, Target, and Shopify.

Coinbase Intensifies Pressure on Congress as Stablecoin Reward Provisions Become Flashpoint in Crypto Legislation

According to Bloomberg, Coinbase (COIN) is escalating its pressure on U.S. lawmakers to ensure it can continue offering “rewards” or “yield” to customers holding stablecoins. The company warns that restrictive clauses currently under discussion for a major cryptocurrency bill, set to be unveiled Monday, could jeopardize this business line.

Sources familiar with the matter indicate that the largest U.S. crypto exchange may reconsider its support for the Digital Asset Market Structure Bill if the text includes restrictions beyond “enhanced disclosure requirements” for rewards. The bill is scheduled for a committee markup in the Senate this Thursday. Coinbase has not responded to requests for comment.

The Battle Between Banking and Crypto Interests

Industry insiders report that one proposal under consideration would restrict the eligibility to offer rewards solely to regulated financial institutions. This move has gained support from some in the banking sector who argue that interest-bearing stablecoin accounts could siphon deposits away from traditional banks.

Coinbase has already applied for a National Trust Charter, which could eventually allow it to offer such rewards under those rules. However, native crypto firms are fighting to ensure that exchange-based reward models are recognized as a viable business model even without a banking license. They warn that broader restrictions could upend the industry’s competitive landscape.

Political Leverage and Financial Impact

Coinbase’s threat to withdraw support carries significant weight. In the 2023–2024 election cycle, the crypto industry emerged as a top corporate political donor, pouring massive funds into supported candidates. Under CEO Brian Armstrong, Coinbase donated $1 million to Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration and was among the corporate sponsors for the proposed White House ballroom project.

For Coinbase, stablecoin rewards are a core issue. The exchange shares interest income generated from reserves of the USDC stablecoin, which is issued by Circle (CRCL). USDC parked on Coinbase provides a steady revenue stream that has proven crucial during bear markets. Coinbase also holds a minority stake in Circle, currently the largest issuer of stablecoins compliant with the laws passed last July.

Currently, Coinbase encourages users to hold USDC on its platform by offering rewards—such as 3.5% for Coinbase One balances. If the Market Structure Bill bans these incentives, the number of users holding stablecoins on exchanges could plummet. According to Bloomberg data, Coinbase’s total stablecoin revenue is estimated to have reached $1.3 billion in 2025, a figure that now faces significant downside risk.

The Devil in the Details

While the exact impact remains unclear until the final bill text is released, sources confirm that provisions regarding rewards will certainly be included.

The GENIUS Act and Regulatory Background

The second Trump administration has moved quickly to deliver victories for the digital asset industry, including the passage of the GENIUS Act last July—the first federal regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers. Its signing triggered a wave of entries into the stablecoin space, ranging from retailers to traditional financial institutions. Even the Trump family became involved prior to the bill’s passage through World Liberty Financial, which launched its own stablecoin, USD1.

Despite the administration’s push for rapid legislation, the rewards controversy has eroded the bipartisan base for the Market Structure Bill. Coinbase’s warning marks an escalation in tensions that could delay the bill’s review, potentially pushing completion beyond this year. Nathan Dean, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, noted that without bipartisan support during the markup, the probability of the bill passing in the first half of the year has dropped below 70%.

The GENIUS Act prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield solely for “holding the token,” but it does not explicitly prevent third-party partners like Coinbase from offering rewards based on customer balances.

The banking industry has expressed fierce opposition to exchanges paying rewards, viewing it as a drain on the banking system that weakens community lending. The American Bankers Association (ABA) stated in a recent letter: “If billions are diverted from community bank lending, small businesses, farmers, students, and homebuyers in towns like ours will suffer. Crypto exchanges… are not designed to fill this lending gap, nor do they offer FDIC-insured products—a point they omit in their aggressive advertising.”

Dollar Hegemony and Potential Compromises

In contrast, the crypto industry describes the banking sector’s efforts as an attempt to undermine the established gains of the GENIUS Act. Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad recently posted on X (formerly Twitter) that maintaining reward mechanisms tied to stablecoins is essential for preserving U.S. dollar hegemony, noting China’s plans to begin paying interest on its central bank digital currency (e-CNY).

This tension leaves Senators in a dilemma: under pressure from the administration to pass further legislation, they are forced to decide on an issue where compromise is difficult.

Sources suggest a potential middle ground could be allowing only entities with bank licenses or financial institutions to provide rewards on stablecoin balances. Recently, five crypto firms received conditional approval from the OCC to become national trust banks. These approvals were also met with fierce opposition from bank lobbyists, who argue that crypto firms are overextending the use of restrictive trust charters, posing a threat to the stability of the U.S. financial system (AFG).

Without clear restrictions, some industry players believe the situation will devolve into a game of “whack-a-mole,” where crypto firms continuously find new ways to reward users. As William Gaybrick, President of Technology and Business at Stripe, noted in a 2025 interview: “In a world where you hold a stablecoin in an app, that app will always find some way to give you something back for it.”